Convenor: Annie Fitzmaurice
Participants: Phelim McDermott , Matilda Leyser and one other man – sorry can’t read his name
Summary:
We talked about the Depression in 1930’s USA – one of the best times for artists.
Fear and dread doesn’t help. Can’t see possibilities.
Whatever happens is the only thing that could have happened – remembering this helps!
Finding out what’s happening anyway.
Young Tories are canvassing – who votes for them?
The witnesses/the polls are creating realities, the critics are affecting what happens.
Who understands how to play? The Debate – the papers didn’t notice Nick Clegg. What happens when you see possibility....some people are saying, “Now I know he could win I might vote for him.”
The identity of being “against”. And the “ wanting to be on the winning side”.
We’re all going to wait, what to do?
It’s unknown.
In the privacy of the booth. Voting with your heart not your head.
Not discussing votes – privacy, disclosure, open. Seeing your own identity.
The idea of voting tactically, is about polarity, what about another way? Hung parliaments in Europe. In a hung parliament/coalition government, who’s the opposition?
Where has the present system got us??
There’s a lack of freedom in the system of “joining sides”.
PR is a dodgy kind of factional....nothing gets done. Playing democracy not the real deal.
Maybe the time has come that instead of the idea you’ve got to have a “strong leader” – there could be collaborating and then all the other voices heard?
Democracy is f*cked.
The disenfranchised.
FEAR and DREAD.
Facing fear rather than panic. Twin demons – power (what was the other one?? I’ve only written power – maybe it was power and panic??)
Fear is useful to save you from a snake, a man with a knife, as opposed to anxiety which is not useful, but the process of creating anxiety (for example about immigration etc) creates a situation where you can’t breathe in....
DREAD – inevitable???
Like the news on AIDS in the 1980’s, going back to the Thatcher era, reacting to invented demons. The level of debate – childish and inept....
If David Cameron and his team are at the helm......revealing the f*cked up-ness......
Hung parliament.
Do you really want to win....this election, the system could change with whoever wins, some short term pain, in order to get change.
There’s shit to come – our situation financially, worse than Greece.....
What can we do about it?????
Talking around the kitchen table, airing it.
Not feeling isolated.
Losing hope – not losing hope.
Who are the young Tories? Are they allies........
A conversation that can be had.
A Tory praying to cure gay people.......
Waking up to what we do have.
Awareness of our privileges – we’re free to talk about all of this unlike many place in the world.
Hearing the Lithuania woman present at D+D tonight expressing her perspective on our arts funding system (it’s wonderful!).
It’s crucial to value our freedom.
Deciding who to vote for....
The newness of the situation, the most exciting thing may be a hung parliament.................
Showing posts with label ArtsCampaign. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ArtsCampaign. Show all posts
Wednesday, 12 May 2010
Monday, 10 May 2010
Campaign for the Arts, 5th May Report
These are the issues raised at the Arts Campaign open space, on the evening of the 5th May. Where a report has been typed up, the issue name links to the report.
The invitation is here.
Do you really think that British politicians don’t care about the Arts?’ and ‘What do we want?- A Wish List...
If change funding where from?
What can we do about fear and dread?
An Open Space with famous people issuing the invite? And/or In the House of Commons?
Performance workshops for Politicians? Alternative ways to get government to value the arts?
How can we organise/create an arts event that allows anyone to contribute, making all who input feel validated, heard, satisfied and creative?
Puppet Power! How do we actually make this happen?
How can we as different kinds of arts practitioners use our specialist skills to present our perspectives to government/funding bodies?
Mask Maker artist theatre maker activist – Who would like to work with me?
What is the Arts Campaign?
How is everyone going to repay their debt?
The invitation is here.
Do you really think that British politicians don’t care about the Arts?’ and ‘What do we want?- A Wish List...
If change funding where from?
What can we do about fear and dread?
An Open Space with famous people issuing the invite? And/or In the House of Commons?
Performance workshops for Politicians? Alternative ways to get government to value the arts?
How can we organise/create an arts event that allows anyone to contribute, making all who input feel validated, heard, satisfied and creative?
Puppet Power! How do we actually make this happen?
How can we as different kinds of arts practitioners use our specialist skills to present our perspectives to government/funding bodies?
Mask Maker artist theatre maker activist – Who would like to work with me?
What is the Arts Campaign?
How is everyone going to repay their debt?
‘Do you really think that British politicians don’t care about the Arts?’ and ‘What do we want?- A Wish List’.
Convenor: Amelia
Summary:
- No funding cuts
- Let the arts deliver other policies outside the arts policies- embed us in health, education, economy, employment etc.
- The Arts Council to be less wary of commercialism- it is not always a dirty word.
- More sharing of resources between arts organisations.
- Experts in each of the art forms to deliver funding. Job swaps and sabbaticals for Arts Council relationship managers.
- Job swaps between venue managers and small companies
- Funders to encourage and value risk taking.
- Funders to uphold the importance of access and inclusion.
- Encourage diversity by distributing government funding not solely through the Arts Council. Could DCMS give to trusts and foundations?
- ACE officers to train local authority funders.
- A target of number of performances that ACE officers have to see.
- National roll out of the ‘percent for arts’ scheme where building developers must set aside a certain amount of their budget for supporting arts in new communities.
- Performing Arts to be on the national curriculum at key stage 3 as a subject in its own right, not part of English.
- Extension of existing Creative Partnerships to place more artists in schools.
We then got into a bigger, ideological discussion about why every time a new government comes in we have to have to re-establish the importance of the arts. We agreed that as artists we have not made the case to the British public/government that the arts are an incontestable social good.
We discussed advertising campaigns for Theatre as a whole and confidence in speaking out in defence of theatre and the arts.
Jonathan Holmes (jon) is collecting email addresses of anyone who might be interested in joining a policy group that could work on delivering the ideas which have come out of the Arts Campaign D&Ds.
Summary:
- No funding cuts
- Let the arts deliver other policies outside the arts policies- embed us in health, education, economy, employment etc.
- The Arts Council to be less wary of commercialism- it is not always a dirty word.
- More sharing of resources between arts organisations.
- Experts in each of the art forms to deliver funding. Job swaps and sabbaticals for Arts Council relationship managers.
- Job swaps between venue managers and small companies
- Funders to encourage and value risk taking.
- Funders to uphold the importance of access and inclusion.
- Encourage diversity by distributing government funding not solely through the Arts Council. Could DCMS give to trusts and foundations?
- ACE officers to train local authority funders.
- A target of number of performances that ACE officers have to see.
- National roll out of the ‘percent for arts’ scheme where building developers must set aside a certain amount of their budget for supporting arts in new communities.
- Performing Arts to be on the national curriculum at key stage 3 as a subject in its own right, not part of English.
- Extension of existing Creative Partnerships to place more artists in schools.
We then got into a bigger, ideological discussion about why every time a new government comes in we have to have to re-establish the importance of the arts. We agreed that as artists we have not made the case to the British public/government that the arts are an incontestable social good.
We discussed advertising campaigns for Theatre as a whole and confidence in speaking out in defence of theatre and the arts.
Jonathan Holmes (jon) is collecting email addresses of anyone who might be interested in joining a policy group that could work on delivering the ideas which have come out of the Arts Campaign D&Ds.
If Change Funding Where From?
Convenor: Liz Porter
Summary
I called this session as I am concerned that if the Conservatives get in, the Arts Council will become even smaller and I’m concerned we will lose disability arts and that if fear of change. Fear that there will be less support for individuals, lots of pressure to look for corporate funding.
If ACE cut there will be a lack of understanding and would local authorities understand access, how they assess expertise around disability and access issues.
Will we have to tick more boxes?
High levels of competition for small pots of funding
Summary
I called this session as I am concerned that if the Conservatives get in, the Arts Council will become even smaller and I’m concerned we will lose disability arts and that if fear of change. Fear that there will be less support for individuals, lots of pressure to look for corporate funding.
If ACE cut there will be a lack of understanding and would local authorities understand access, how they assess expertise around disability and access issues.
Will we have to tick more boxes?
High levels of competition for small pots of funding
Friday, 9 April 2010
Campaign for the Arts, 6th of April reports
These are the issues raised at the Arts Campaign open space, on the evening of the 6th of April. Where a report has been typed up, the issue name links to the report.
The invitation is here.
What are the parties' arts policies?
The election is performing arts
What kind of work is being done? How can we get ACE to tell us (collect statistics)
I'm voting tactically- I really want you to too (the Tories will be worse)
Progress in society is mirrored by progress in the arts. What is the best case to make for increased arts funding?
Comments on web pages about arts funding are overwhelmingly dominated by people who thing the arts should not be subsidised. Is it worth doing anything about this?
Is it bad to think that somehow the arts will thrive is pushed out by the politicians?
It's not artists we need to protect, it's audiences
Does giving young people a creative voice matter?
Is a month a long time in arts politics- what can we do now?
Art has forgotten its audience
Did you contact your MP? What was the response?
I'm not sure if I dislike David Cameron or Andrew Lloyd Webber more. Is this connected? Can we do anything?
I feel like a traitor voting labour ant yet...
Unless theatre is radical, it cannot have any political effect
I know those who come are the right people... but where is everyone? Apathy in the Arts
The October revolution?
The invitation is here.
What are the parties' arts policies?
The election is performing arts
What kind of work is being done? How can we get ACE to tell us (collect statistics)
I'm voting tactically- I really want you to too (the Tories will be worse)
Progress in society is mirrored by progress in the arts. What is the best case to make for increased arts funding?
Comments on web pages about arts funding are overwhelmingly dominated by people who thing the arts should not be subsidised. Is it worth doing anything about this?
Is it bad to think that somehow the arts will thrive is pushed out by the politicians?
It's not artists we need to protect, it's audiences
Does giving young people a creative voice matter?
Is a month a long time in arts politics- what can we do now?
Art has forgotten its audience
Did you contact your MP? What was the response?
I'm not sure if I dislike David Cameron or Andrew Lloyd Webber more. Is this connected? Can we do anything?
I feel like a traitor voting labour ant yet...
Unless theatre is radical, it cannot have any political effect
I know those who come are the right people... but where is everyone? Apathy in the Arts
The October revolution?
What are the parties' arts policies?
Title: What are the parties' arts policies?
Convenor: Kirsty Lothian
Summary
Amelia Bird had done a lot of research- she passed on these links:
Conservative policy:
http://www.shadowdcms.co.uk/pdf/The%20Future%20of%20the%20Arts.pdf
They want to promote philanthropy, and endowment funding, through matched grants from ACE and tax breaks. They also want ACE etc to have no more than 5% overheads, and they want more long term multi-year grants.
They seem to be big on digital technologies, and getting the arts and museums online.
They focus on music in schools- every child is to have a chance to learn a musical instrument, and sing, as well as getting a "solid cultural education"
Lib Dem policy:
http://www.libdems.org.uk/siteFiles/resources/PDF/Power%20of%20Creativity.pdf
They want to set up a cabinet committee on creativity and celebrate the arts more in public buildings and government. They will look at easier visas for artists, more money for Grants For the Arts, and are planning more balance between the regions and London, receptions at number 10 for arts philanthropists and tax schemes, Creative Entreprise start-up loans and red-tape simplification, independent regulation for the BBC, apprenticeships schemes for young people, plenty of arts in schools
Labour policy:
http://www.labour.org.uk/policies/culture-and-arts
They mostly talk about what they have achieved, so I assume they plan to carry on much as they are.
Some of the smaller parties:
The SNP's website is having trouble with policies, but they do have some on the arts, I think. They don't like the arts council, and would prefer direct funding. They think traditional arts are currently underfunded, and Scottish Opera is over funded.
Plaid Cymru don't seem to have any arts policies, but Hywel Williams MP does list Arts as one of his main political interests.
The Greens have a lot to say- largely to do with avoiding discrimination, and strengthening artist led communities, and local and regional arts. They want to Zero rate VAT on live performance, but possibly to tax superstar performances to fund small scale local cultural enterprises.
http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/mfss/mfsscms.html
UKIP has very little to say on the Arts- the closest I could find is part of their Restoring Britishness Policy:
(mainly they like the Last Night of the Proms, and the UK theme is to go back on to Radio 4)
https://ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/1447-restoring-britishness-ukip-policy
The BNP don't have anything to say about the arts or culture at all. They do want more competitive sports in schools though.
The Socialist Workers Party doesn't seem to have any specific policies, let alone arts ones.
Convenor: Kirsty Lothian
Summary
Amelia Bird had done a lot of research- she passed on these links:
Conservative policy:
http://www.shadowdcms.co.uk/pdf/The%20Future%20of%20the%20Arts.pdf
They want to promote philanthropy, and endowment funding, through matched grants from ACE and tax breaks. They also want ACE etc to have no more than 5% overheads, and they want more long term multi-year grants.
They seem to be big on digital technologies, and getting the arts and museums online.
They focus on music in schools- every child is to have a chance to learn a musical instrument, and sing, as well as getting a "solid cultural education"
Lib Dem policy:
http://www.libdems.org.uk/siteFiles/resources/PDF/Power%20of%20Creativity.pdf
They want to set up a cabinet committee on creativity and celebrate the arts more in public buildings and government. They will look at easier visas for artists, more money for Grants For the Arts, and are planning more balance between the regions and London, receptions at number 10 for arts philanthropists and tax schemes, Creative Entreprise start-up loans and red-tape simplification, independent regulation for the BBC, apprenticeships schemes for young people, plenty of arts in schools
Labour policy:
http://www.labour.org.uk/policies/culture-and-arts
They mostly talk about what they have achieved, so I assume they plan to carry on much as they are.
Some of the smaller parties:
The SNP's website is having trouble with policies, but they do have some on the arts, I think. They don't like the arts council, and would prefer direct funding. They think traditional arts are currently underfunded, and Scottish Opera is over funded.
Plaid Cymru don't seem to have any arts policies, but Hywel Williams MP does list Arts as one of his main political interests.
The Greens have a lot to say- largely to do with avoiding discrimination, and strengthening artist led communities, and local and regional arts. They want to Zero rate VAT on live performance, but possibly to tax superstar performances to fund small scale local cultural enterprises.
http://policy.greenparty.org.uk/mfss/mfsscms.html
UKIP has very little to say on the Arts- the closest I could find is part of their Restoring Britishness Policy:
(mainly they like the Last Night of the Proms, and the UK theme is to go back on to Radio 4)
https://ukip.org/content/ukip-policies/1447-restoring-britishness-ukip-policy
The BNP don't have anything to say about the arts or culture at all. They do want more competitive sports in schools though.
The Socialist Workers Party doesn't seem to have any specific policies, let alone arts ones.
The election is performing arts
Convenor: Alice
Participants: Alice, Phelim, Lydia
Summary:
1- Maybe all this "spin" is good! It gets people interested
2- Politicians often have tour managers, make up artists, stylists etc. So do some actors and some artists.
3- Compulsory voting?
Participants: Alice, Phelim, Lydia
Summary:
1- Maybe all this "spin" is good! It gets people interested
2- Politicians often have tour managers, make up artists, stylists etc. So do some actors and some artists.
3- Compulsory voting?
I'm voting tactically and I really want you to too
Convenor: Stella Duffy
Summary
- How do we know where "best" to vote tactically?
The BBC website has useful information, including a list of "battleground" constituencies for each party:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/default.stm
- Paralysed politics
- How sad that we're defensive voting
- One of the problems in arts funding is not enough confidence to stop funding people when they're shit
- Constitutional reform- can we get a written constitution??
- Steven Whinnery- the fox/eggs analogy (Steven compared the parties to foxes- labour will grab the chickens in it's mouth, but will fill up with regret, and will drop the mauled chickens again. If the Tories get in, then there will be no chickens- no eggs under the Tories!)
- Change the architecture of the debating chambers- use the semi-circle instead
- More young people live in varied places, not one place, so it is harder to get involved in local politics
- Write to your MP
- Tories who wouldn't vote Tory <= war?? (someone's Tory parents (retired military) don't want to vote Conservative because of their stance on the war)
- Democracy is not sophisticated (deep democracy might be)
- Jenn: at leat the top issues aren't "gay marriage" and "abortion", at least it's the economy and immigration
- The arts are being discussed differently by political parties
- Labour have put it on the agenda (and has that created arts with agenda?)
- Arts has benefitted, fundamentally changed funding (untrue stuff from Jeremy Hunt on arts funding!)
While it seemed that we were coming from a disillusioned/hopeless perspective to start, we were glad we were having this discussion, it did feel great to be talking about it, and we were reminded by Rebecca that plenty of arts orgs/theatres etc ARE putting on stuff about the election/politics, we're not alone in our desire for a better, more engaged world - or a better, more engaged arts! (And I especially liked the range of ages in this discussion!)
Summary
- How do we know where "best" to vote tactically?
The BBC website has useful information, including a list of "battleground" constituencies for each party:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/default.stm
- Paralysed politics
- How sad that we're defensive voting
- One of the problems in arts funding is not enough confidence to stop funding people when they're shit
- Constitutional reform- can we get a written constitution??
- Steven Whinnery- the fox/eggs analogy (Steven compared the parties to foxes- labour will grab the chickens in it's mouth, but will fill up with regret, and will drop the mauled chickens again. If the Tories get in, then there will be no chickens- no eggs under the Tories!)
- Change the architecture of the debating chambers- use the semi-circle instead
- More young people live in varied places, not one place, so it is harder to get involved in local politics
- Write to your MP
- Tories who wouldn't vote Tory <= war?? (someone's Tory parents (retired military) don't want to vote Conservative because of their stance on the war)
- Democracy is not sophisticated (deep democracy might be)
- Jenn: at leat the top issues aren't "gay marriage" and "abortion", at least it's the economy and immigration
- The arts are being discussed differently by political parties
- Labour have put it on the agenda (and has that created arts with agenda?)
- Arts has benefitted, fundamentally changed funding (untrue stuff from Jeremy Hunt on arts funding!)
While it seemed that we were coming from a disillusioned/hopeless perspective to start, we were glad we were having this discussion, it did feel great to be talking about it, and we were reminded by Rebecca that plenty of arts orgs/theatres etc ARE putting on stuff about the election/politics, we're not alone in our desire for a better, more engaged world - or a better, more engaged arts! (And I especially liked the range of ages in this discussion!)
What kind of work is being done? How can we get ACE to tell us (collect statistics)
Convenor: David James
Summary:
1- The Tories want to push the "American" system of corporate sponsorship/patronage. How do we ensure that this is a partner (Vs a replacement) for Government funding?
2- MPs (from any party) DO want to know how/what is being funded in their patch (ACE, LA, Corporate etc). Who will tell them?
These can be used to lobby for further support- or point out areas of weakness
3- Many parliamentary 'groups' (football, beer, to cite obvious cases) are corporately funded. How can we appeal to parliamentarians to get them more actively involved and passionate about the arts?
Summary:
1- The Tories want to push the "American" system of corporate sponsorship/patronage. How do we ensure that this is a partner (Vs a replacement) for Government funding?
2- MPs (from any party) DO want to know how/what is being funded in their patch (ACE, LA, Corporate etc). Who will tell them?
These can be used to lobby for further support- or point out areas of weakness
3- Many parliamentary 'groups' (football, beer, to cite obvious cases) are corporately funded. How can we appeal to parliamentarians to get them more actively involved and passionate about the arts?
Friday, 19 March 2010
Do you think the performing arts matter in this election?
In this key pre election moment this is an invitation to come together at Toynbee Studios, London E1 6AB on the 6th of April at 7:30pm to discuss and engage with the important issues raised by this question.
Dear All,
Through a series of annual and monthly events called ‘Devoted and Disgruntled’ (or D&D), hosted by Improbable, a large network of people from the performing arts have been building a diverse and ever-expanding community. From the annual gathering this January, attended by several hundred people, has come a new groundswell of energy and discussion around the issues that will be important in a general election debate and beyond.
As a direct result of this, and of the activities of associated organisations such as Jericho House, in the past few weeks there have been discussions online and in various newspapers about the commitment of each party to the arts. These have led, for example, to Ed Vaizey, Tory spokesman for the arts, committing to the maintenance of funding to the arts; to the Lib Dems making a matching commitment; and to The Culture Show on the 4th of March, in which each party was quizzed on their arts policies by Alan Yentob.
From the last D&D meeting at the start of this month emerged the desire to widen this debate to include politicians, audiences and other stakeholders, to engage with these questions in a way that involves genuine and constructive debate.
This then is an invitation from this community to join in these discussions in a style where everybody will be able both to listen and to have their voice heard. The evening will run using Open Space technology which gives anyone the chance to propose a starting point for discussion, then take part in one of these conversations or flit between them all.
If any of these questions concern you, come along:
Do artists care about politics?
Do politicians care about the arts?
What do performing artists and politicians have in common?
As a politician, would you like the opportunity to listen and be listened to? To meet the community who cares about these issues?
As an artist, what would make a difference and win your vote?
As an audience member, what would win your vote? What are your concerns?
What will it be like to be involved in the performing arts after this election?
How can the cultural Olympiad actually leave the culture enriched?
What matters to you most about the future of the performing arts in this country?
It would in particular be terrific if policymakers and prospective ministers were to attend and to participate in a genuinely grassroots exchange of perspectives in an environment not dominated by the usual ‘us and them’ structure of staged panel debates.
We would, in short, love YOU to come and discuss and engage with these vital issues!
Hope to see you there,
Phelim McDermott and Improbable
Jonathan Holmes and Jericho House
DETAILS:
If you cannot attend but would like to be kept in touch email office at improbable.co.uk
The evening runs using Open Space technology which gives anyone the chance to propose a starting point for discussion, then take part in one of these conversations, flit between them all, or head to the bar.
This event is free! No need to book, just turn up on the night, but an RSVP is nice.
Artsadmin at Toynbee Studios: 28 Commercial Street | London | E1 6AB.
Map at: http://www.artsadmin.co.uk/contacts/ For further information or to discuss access requirements get in touch with Lucy at lucy at improbable.co.uk or at the office on 0207 240 4556. Hope to see you there.
Dear All,
Through a series of annual and monthly events called ‘Devoted and Disgruntled’ (or D&D), hosted by Improbable, a large network of people from the performing arts have been building a diverse and ever-expanding community. From the annual gathering this January, attended by several hundred people, has come a new groundswell of energy and discussion around the issues that will be important in a general election debate and beyond.
As a direct result of this, and of the activities of associated organisations such as Jericho House, in the past few weeks there have been discussions online and in various newspapers about the commitment of each party to the arts. These have led, for example, to Ed Vaizey, Tory spokesman for the arts, committing to the maintenance of funding to the arts; to the Lib Dems making a matching commitment; and to The Culture Show on the 4th of March, in which each party was quizzed on their arts policies by Alan Yentob.
From the last D&D meeting at the start of this month emerged the desire to widen this debate to include politicians, audiences and other stakeholders, to engage with these questions in a way that involves genuine and constructive debate.
This then is an invitation from this community to join in these discussions in a style where everybody will be able both to listen and to have their voice heard. The evening will run using Open Space technology which gives anyone the chance to propose a starting point for discussion, then take part in one of these conversations or flit between them all.
If any of these questions concern you, come along:
Do artists care about politics?
Do politicians care about the arts?
What do performing artists and politicians have in common?
As a politician, would you like the opportunity to listen and be listened to? To meet the community who cares about these issues?
As an artist, what would make a difference and win your vote?
As an audience member, what would win your vote? What are your concerns?
What will it be like to be involved in the performing arts after this election?
How can the cultural Olympiad actually leave the culture enriched?
What matters to you most about the future of the performing arts in this country?
It would in particular be terrific if policymakers and prospective ministers were to attend and to participate in a genuinely grassroots exchange of perspectives in an environment not dominated by the usual ‘us and them’ structure of staged panel debates.
We would, in short, love YOU to come and discuss and engage with these vital issues!
Hope to see you there,
Phelim McDermott and Improbable
Jonathan Holmes and Jericho House
DETAILS:
If you cannot attend but would like to be kept in touch email office at improbable.co.uk
The evening runs using Open Space technology which gives anyone the chance to propose a starting point for discussion, then take part in one of these conversations, flit between them all, or head to the bar.
This event is free! No need to book, just turn up on the night, but an RSVP is nice.
Artsadmin at Toynbee Studios: 28 Commercial Street | London | E1 6AB.
Map at: http://www.artsadmin.co.uk/contacts/ For further information or to discuss access requirements get in touch with Lucy at lucy at improbable.co.uk or at the office on 0207 240 4556. Hope to see you there.
Tuesday, 9 February 2010
112 Speaking Doubt to power: How could theatre play a greater role in policymaking?
Convenor:Joe Hallgarten, who carrying out some research you can read about on his blog - http://armslengthstate.blogspot.com/2010/01/speaking-doubt-to-power.html
Participants: A small and perfectly formed group of 10-15 A-list D and D-ers, most of whom stayed for most of the session.
Summary of discussion:
Apologies for this random collection of points – I was too busy listening and talking to make good notes!
• Title of session reminded one participant of the solo piece Nagging Doubt
• Artists as civic leaders – if you want public money, should you be expected to engage in the public realm
• Need for a broker between artists and policymakers
• Reminded of the book ‘the gift’
• Would need to ‘timetable’ arts experiences into the policymaking process
• Examples include Blackwatch being seen by the Scottish parliament, civil servants (mainly from DCMS) often coming ‘informally’ to see Barbican shows
• Performing Arts Lab (PAL) may offer a possible model – Susan Benn
• EU parliament has used theatre in this way
• Example of a minister (in an unnamed country) who, having seen Death of a Salesman, ‘went home and changed his country’s pension policy’.
• Matarasso – rural and community spaces
• Theatre needs to be ‘as simple as possible, no simpler’
• What about film? Why is The Wire having so much influence? Or is it?
• Theatre as collective experience
• Forum Theatre
• Kinnock etc influenced by Absence of War
• Maybe we should influence policy MAs etc – how do these emerging policy wonks engage in the arts?
• www.haringwoods.com
• Creating doubt needs space
• Policymaking used to scenario planning/modelling. Arts and theatre could play a role in this – even around dystopias, since scenarios don’t have to be realistic to be useful
• BAC – Coney Show and Home Sweet Home
• Concept of Timenos – From Senate
Participants: A small and perfectly formed group of 10-15 A-list D and D-ers, most of whom stayed for most of the session.
Summary of discussion:
Apologies for this random collection of points – I was too busy listening and talking to make good notes!
• Title of session reminded one participant of the solo piece Nagging Doubt
• Artists as civic leaders – if you want public money, should you be expected to engage in the public realm
• Need for a broker between artists and policymakers
• Reminded of the book ‘the gift’
• Would need to ‘timetable’ arts experiences into the policymaking process
• Examples include Blackwatch being seen by the Scottish parliament, civil servants (mainly from DCMS) often coming ‘informally’ to see Barbican shows
• Performing Arts Lab (PAL) may offer a possible model – Susan Benn
• EU parliament has used theatre in this way
• Example of a minister (in an unnamed country) who, having seen Death of a Salesman, ‘went home and changed his country’s pension policy’.
• Matarasso – rural and community spaces
• Theatre needs to be ‘as simple as possible, no simpler’
• What about film? Why is The Wire having so much influence? Or is it?
• Theatre as collective experience
• Forum Theatre
• Kinnock etc influenced by Absence of War
• Maybe we should influence policy MAs etc – how do these emerging policy wonks engage in the arts?
• www.haringwoods.com
• Creating doubt needs space
• Policymaking used to scenario planning/modelling. Arts and theatre could play a role in this – even around dystopias, since scenarios don’t have to be realistic to be useful
• BAC – Coney Show and Home Sweet Home
• Concept of Timenos – From Senate
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)