There is a list of all the reports on this site here. You can also see lists of the sessions not yet reported on here, and a list of Monday's action sessions here. More recently, this blog has begun to house reports related to the Arts Campaign too

This is what we talked about all weekend:
Wordle: D&D5

Friday, 5 February 2010

100 Where are today’s theatre visions for a better tomorrow?

Convener: Dominic Campbell (The Home Of The Bewildered; homeofbewildered at gmail.com)

Participants: Glioria Lind, Jonathon Petherbridge, Niamh McCann, Jo Turner, Nick Coupe, Jack Klaff, Lynette Moran, and others……

Summary of discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:

The discussion was around theatres roles in creating imaginative alternatives provoked by a perceived re-emergence of theatre engaged with societal issues either overtly (It’s about X) or inherently (e.g the style/form/aesthetic/ relationship between performer and audience).

So here are the bullets:
Began talking about structures; the way we engage people
Is the structure of a performance a reflection of the way we consume entertainment
The re-emmergence of issues in the public domain – eg feminism
How do you make things that are not socially acceptable – “old activism in new ways” joy with entertainment/silliness/ frivolous and serious
Unlimited Theatre co – using online connections to open up possibilities for how audiences to engage – eg taking the story or aspects of it and developing it themselves
“Story is the killer App” (application as in iphone)
“I’ve got issues with issues” overt content is a turn off
The audiences right to reply- in the nature of the work or via chat room
“Theatre is dialogue”
Are we getting smarter about the way we play with audiences – cf Punchdrunk, Coney, SlungLow and the affect of gaming
OR
Are we just really manipulative in a different way, creating the illusion of allowing the audiences decision making
OR
Is this a reflection of the tailoring of products eg “Your burger cooked your way”
Allowing the audience to engage with the process the makers are going through (eg Phelim introducing Panic to the audience by telling them what’s about to happen) also allows you to take risks/fail which in itself has a fascinating tension
Because;
In Theatre unlike the other arts the artist is present
So – should we give ourselves a break?
Do we fell guilty cos we have a good time making stuff and is this why we sometimes think its got to “hurt”?
Is allowing ourselves to enjoy what we’re doing, to take pleasure in it a political shift?
The re-emergence of Joan Littlewoods notions – funpalace/itinerant national theatres
Exchange can happen in any environment – examples from all sorts of practice, some about shifting contexts
Liz lerman’s “hiking the horizon” see www.danceexchange.org
Is allowing ourselves to make it easier to do a way of opening up locked issues
“Talk is the new rock and roll” – the new growth of public debate, theatrical spaces addressing something missing in other areas of Civic life
“Theatre is Society debating with itself” – But are we talking to ourselves?
An individuals internal conflict sometimes results in their creating work – a form of processing internal discussion
Change isn’t just about the content but about presenting – what/when/where/how/context
The evolution of story – write as you think –interested in telling story but also in how its told –HBO’s subversion of older ways of telling stories
Is it a story or an experience?
Difference between telling and showing
No two audiences are the same – the gradually increasing diversity of audiences. The need for older people and a historical perspective and time. Change takes time
The story appropriate to the age

Other references; The Square/ Una Mc Kevitt’s Victor and Gord/Tim Crouch/Complicite

No comments:

Post a Comment